plork_debut_gamelan.jpg

The South Car­olina news­pa­per The State recently men­tioned The Prince­ton Lap­top Orches­tra in a review of a con­cert devoted to pieces by elec­tronic music guru Paul Lan­sky. The reviewer refers to Prince­ton as the home of the “geek-revered” Lap­top Orches­tra (aka PLOrk). Geek or not, you can hear some of PLOrk’s much-celebrated music here.

 

Design%20Con%20header.gif

What skills will the engi­neer of the future need?

Leah Jamieson, a keynote speaker at Design­Con 2007 this week, said that in addi­tion to impart­ing superb tech­ni­cal skills, engi­neer­ing schools must reward inge­nu­ity and flex­i­bil­ity and give stu­dents oppor­tu­ni­ties to develop lead­er­ship and busi­ness skills.

Jamieson, who received her doc­tor­ate from Prince­ton Engi­neer­ing in 1977 and who is the dean of engi­neer­ing at Pur­due, said that the cur­rent “half life” of an engineer’s edu­ca­tion — by which she means the point at which half of what an engi­neer has learned is obso­lete — may be as lit­tle as five years.

In many ways, the world is chang­ing,” said Jamieson. “Are our grad­u­ates going to have the skills they need over the next 40 years?” Jamieson’s com­ments reflect the mis­sion of Princeton’s Cen­ter for Inno­va­tion in Engi­neer­ing Edu­ca­tion (Jamieson sits on CIEE’s advi­sory council).

At Design­Con, Jamieson, who is pres­i­dent of IEEE this year, was given the Inter­na­tional Engi­neer­ing Con­sor­tium Fel­low Award. As an IEC fel­low, she is in good com­pany: other fel­lows include Gor­don Moore, Jack Kilby, and David Packard.

Both EETimes and EDN cov­ered Jamieson’s address. View Jamieson’s whole speech via stream­ing video on the Design­Con web­site. You can also read a round­table dis­cus­sion on engi­neer­ing edu­ca­tion fea­tur­ing Jamieson, Michigan’s David Mun­son and Princeton’s H. Vin­cent Poor (all three Prince­ton Engi­neer­ing Ph.D.s who were named deans of engi­neer­ing this year).

 

Billington%2C%20David%20Princeton%20University%20book%20jacket.gif

Matt Blum­berg, CEO of the email mar­ket­ing com­pany Return Path, writes in his blog about David Billington’s new book, The Inno­va­tors: The Engi­neer­ing Pio­neers Who Made Amer­ica Mod­ern.

It feels at many points in the book that you could insert some dif­fer­ent names and dates and be read­ing a his­tory of the Inter­net or infor­ma­tion age,” writes Blum­berg, who grad­u­ated from Prince­ton in 1992 and who says that Billing­ton was his favorite teacher and his senior the­sis advisor.

Billing­ton talks about the book, which he wrote with his son, in this recent Q&A. Read Blumberg’s entire Only­Once blog entry here.

 

bigstockphoto_Security_Pad_Locks_40080.jpg

Ed Fel­ten, Alex Hal­der­man, and Ari Feld­man last fall proved that Diebold’s elec­tronic elec­tion machines were sus­cep­ti­ble to being infected with mali­cious, vote-altering soft­ware. In their now-famous video, they also demon­strated that the lock to the machine’s mem­ory card door was eas­ily picked.

But why pick the lock when you can make a dupli­cate, asks Ross Kinard at Sploit­Cast? Kinard sent Hal­der­man three keys that he made at home with a drill, by fol­low­ing a pho­to­graph of the keys that Diebold fea­tured on its website.

Hal­der­man reports that two of the three home­made keys open the Diebold machine that the Prince­ton trio has in its possession.

Read more and see a video of Kinard’s key-manufacturing tech­nique on Free­dom to Tin­ker. Brad­blog also offers a report.

 

A National Acad­e­mies com­mit­tee of dis­tin­guished sci­en­tists today rec­om­mended that the National Sci­ence Foun­da­tion spon­sor prizes to spur inno­va­tion in strate­gic areas such as pol­lu­tion sen­sors, self-assembly in nan­otech­nol­ogy and low-carbon energy technologies.

One of the com­mit­tee mem­bers is Princeton’s Claire Gmachl, direc­tor of a multimillion-dollar NSF-funded Engi­neer­ing Research Cen­ter known as MIRTHE whose goal is to rev­o­lu­tion­ize sen­sor technology.

You can down­load the committee’s full report from the National Acad­e­mies home page.

 

Benziger_fuel%20cell_Princeton%20University.gif

Sci­en­tific Amer­i­can reports today on a super-efficient fuel cell invented Jay Ben­ziger and his for­mer under­grad­u­ate stu­dent Claire Woo.

One of the first pos­si­ble appli­ca­tions of the fuel cell might be in lawn­mow­ers, which sur­pris­ingly are big con­trib­u­tors to green­house gases. Ben­ziger and Woo will pub­lish their find­ings in the Feb­ru­ary issue of the jour­nal Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing News.

Read more on the National Sci­ence Foundation’s web­site or on Eurekalert.

 

Chou%2C%20Stephen%2C%20nanoimprinting%20Princeton%20University.jpg

Red Her­ring today reports on Stephen Chou’s lat­est improve­ment on a nanoim­print­ing tech­nique he pio­neered that promises to rev­o­lu­tion­ize the way com­puter chips are made.

Nanoim­print­ing greatly sim­pli­fies the pro­duc­tion of com­puter microchips by cre­at­ing molds that can emboss intri­cate pat­terns onto sil­i­con chips. But air bub­bles cre­ated dur­ing one type of nanoim­print­ing can dis­tort the pat­terns in the molds. Now Chou has fig­ured out a way to get rid of the bubbles.

Nanonex, the com­pany founded by Chou to com­mer­cial­ize the tech­nol­ogy, thus­far has sold pri­mar­ily to lab­o­ra­to­ries. But Chou said that this lat­est devel­op­ment could make nanoim­printed chips fea­si­ble for the mass mar­ket. This has poten­tially huge impli­ca­tions, since nanoim­print­ing may accel­er­ate Moore’s Law, which holds that the num­ber of tran­sis­tors on inte­grated cir­cuits dou­bles every 18 months.

In 2003, MIT’s Tech­nol­ogy Review iden­ti­fied nanoim­print­ing as one of “ten emerg­ing tech­nolo­gies that will change the world.” Last month, Chou’s work was cited in a report in Sci­ence.

Chou’s lat­est break­through has been reported widely on the web. Best head­line award goes to The Engi­neer Online for “Burst­ing the cheap-chip bub­ble bar­rier.” You can also read more on Eurekalert.

 

The School of Engi­neer­ing at Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity has a long, august tra­di­tion of pro­duc­ing world-class lead­ers in indus­try and gov­ern­ment. But lib­eral pundits?

Yesterday’s Philadel­phia Inquirer fea­tured Juan Melli, a grad­u­ate stu­dent in mechan­i­cal and aero­space engi­neer­ing whose polit­i­cal blog has “become a gal­va­niz­ing force for New Jer­sey lib­er­als and an increas­ingly influ­en­tial must-read for the polit­i­cally inclined.”

New Jer­sey Gov. Corzine invited Melli to his “state of the state” address last week. And last month the blog Pol­i­tic­snj named Melli “politi­cian of the year.”

Read the full Inquirer arti­cle here.

 

Massey%2C%20Bill%20Princeton%20ORFE_sm2.jpg

The three decades of the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s at Bell Lab­o­ra­to­ries were to black sci­en­tists what the Harlem Renais­sance of the 1920s was to black artists, accord­ing to William Massey, who was at Bell Labs dur­ing that era and who is now a pro­fes­sor at Princeton.

Today, as part of the Uni­ver­sity of Michigan’s Mar­tin Luther King Sym­po­sium Massey is deliv­er­ing an address on Bell Labs as an incu­ba­tor for tal­ented African-American sci­en­tists and innovators.

The address is in honor of Mar­jorie Lee Browne, the first African-American woman to earn a Ph.D. in math­e­mat­ics from the Uni­ver­sity of Michigan.

Massey, Edwin S. Wilsey Pro­fes­sor of Oper­a­tions Research and Finan­cial Engi­neer­ing at Prince­ton, spe­cial­izes in queue­ing the­ory, a key math­e­mat­i­cal tool used to solve many prob­lems of pro­vid­ing com­mu­ni­ca­tions ser­vices, from the old-fashioned tele­phone ser­vice to Inter­net phe­nom­ena like Nap­ster and YouTube.

In Novem­ber he was awarded the Blackwell-Tapia Prize, in recog­ni­tion of his out­stand­ing record of achieve­ment in math­e­mat­i­cal research and his men­tor­ing of minori­ties and women in the field of math­e­mat­ics. Also in Novem­ber Massey and Robert Van­der­bei were inducted as fel­lows of the Insti­tute for Oper­a­tions Research and the Man­age­ment Sci­ences — an honor accorded to fewer than 1 per­cent of the institute’s mem­ber­ship and made in recog­ni­tion of sig­nif­i­cant research contributions.”

Read a recent pro­file of Massey here.

 

Leung%2C%20Tim%20Princeton%20University%20ORFE_web.jpg

Con­tro­ver­sial stock options for com­pany exec­u­tives may be much less costly to share­hold­ers than cur­rent math­e­mat­i­cal mod­els sug­gest, accord­ing to research pre­sented Jan. 5 by Tim Leung of Princeton’s Depart­ment of Oper­a­tions Research and Finan­cial Engineering.

At the annual meet­ing of the Amer­i­can Math­e­mat­i­cal Soci­ety, Leung demon­strated that, in one sce­nario, stock options were worth about half of what they would be val­ued if one were to cal­cu­late their worth using a con­ven­tional method.

Leung and Ron­nie Sir­car, also of ORFE, sub­mit­ted a paper on this research to the jour­nal Social Sci­ence Research Net­work, where an abstract and a down­load­able copy of the paper can be found.

Read more on Eurekalert!