An inter­view with Ed Fel­ten, direc­tor of the Princeton’s Cen­ter for Infor­ma­tion Tech­nol­ogy Pol­icy, on a “Do Not Track” sys­tem for web browsers aired recently on NPR.

Fel­ten, who is cur­rently on leave as chief tech­nol­o­gist for the Fed­eral Trade Com­mis­sion and a mem­ber of the Do Not Track work­ing group, called on adver­tis­ers to vol­un­tar­ily be  “more polite” when track­ing web activ­ity of users.

The adver­tiser tries to inject track­ing on the user’s com­puter, and the user tries to engage in tech­ni­cal block­ing mea­sures,” Fel­ten said. “That kind of arms race is really not good for anybody.”

:: :: ::

Tagged with:
 

Sounds to good to be true: Naveen Verma and col­leagues are devel­op­ing a tech­nol­ogy “that could lead to wide­spread wire­less charg­ing sta­tions for all our electronics.”

Verma, assis­tant pro­fes­sor of elec­tri­cal engi­neer­ing, is inter­viewed by IEEE Spec­trum in this report.

Image cour­tesy War­ren Rieutort-Louis.

:: :: ::

Tagged with:
 
arvind narayanan

arvind narayanan

 

Kim Zetter has writ­ten a fas­ci­nat­ing, in-depth pro­file of com­puter sci­en­tist and data pri­vacy expert Arvind Narayanan. As the arti­cle notes, Narayanan is “head­ing to Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity next year to join the well-regarded Cen­ter for Infor­ma­tion Tech­nol­ogy Pol­icy, led by com­puter sci­en­tist Ed Fel­ten.”

:: :: ::

Tagged with:
 
Ed Felten

Ed Fel­ten

Deliv­er­ing a USENIX con­fer­ence keynote address in Boston this week, FTC chief tech­nol­o­gist Ed Fel­ten urged fel­low com­puter sci­en­tists to do as he has done and serve in government.

Fel­ten said that “tech­nol­o­gists should seek out gov­ern­ment posts because it gives them the oppor­tu­nity to affect pub­lic pol­icy, which often affects their jobs,” reports Chris Kanara­cus of IDG News.

Fel­ten is on leave from Prince­ton, where he is a pro­fes­sor of com­puter sci­ence and direc­tor of the Cen­ter for Infor­ma­tion Tech­nol­ogy Pol­icy.

:: :: ::

Tagged with:
 
David Brooks

David Brooks

Prince­ton is on a bit of a win­ning streak when it comes to ACM’s annual Mau­rice Wilkes Award for con­tri­bu­tions to com­puter archi­tec­ture in the first 20 years of someone’s career.

This year it went to David M. Brooks, Gor­don McKay Pro­fes­sor of Com­puter Sci­ence in the Har­vard School of Engi­neer­ing and Applied Sci­ences, who earned his Ph.D. in elec­tri­cal engi­neer­ing from Prince­ton in 2001.

Last year Kevin Skadron, who earned his Ph.D. in com­puter sci­ence from Prince­ton in 1999, won the same prize. He is a pro­fes­sor of com­puter sci­ence at the Uni­ver­sity of Virginia.

Mar­garet Martonosi, Hugh Trum­bull Adams ’35 Pro­fes­sor of Com­puter Sci­ence, was Brooks’s the­sis adviser and co-adviser to Skadron along with Doug Clark, pro­fes­sor of com­puter science.

Photo of David Brooks cour­tesy of Harvard.

:: :: ::

Con­grat­u­la­tions to Prince­ton University’s 2012 Anita Borg win­ners: Willa Chen, Angela Dai, Amy Ouster­hout, and Kanika Pas­richa. They will visit Google in Moun­tain View, California, this sum­mer for a net­work­ing retreat. Read more on the Google Anita Borg Memo­r­ial site.

The New York Times Mag­a­zine this week fea­tures a wire­less “tooth tat­too” devel­oped at Prince­ton that detects harm­ful bacteria.

The sliver-thin device — made of silk, graphene, and a tiny antenna — is applied to the tooth much like a child’s stick-on tat­too. It can detect bac­te­ria asso­ci­ated with not just cav­i­ties but, per­haps more impor­tant, dis­eases else­where in the body. The researchers have already used it to iden­tify bac­te­ria asso­ci­ated with stom­ach ulcers and some cancers.

The Times included the tat­too in a piece fea­tur­ing “32 Inno­va­tions That Will Change Your Tomor­row.” See the full piece here (the tooth tat­too is inven­tion is #23).

The Times isn’t the only media out­let enrap­tured with the poten­tial of the tooth tattoo.

Read more cov­er­age in IEEE Spec­trum, the Daily Mail, Giz­mowatch, the Tren­ton Times, and the New York Daily News.

The research was reported March 27 in the jour­nal Nature Com­mu­ni­ca­tions.The paper’s Prince­ton authors included Michael McAlpine, assis­tant pro­fes­sor of mechan­i­cal and aero­space engi­neer­ing, Naveen Verma, assis­tant pro­fes­sor of elec­tri­cal engi­neer­ing, grad­u­ate stu­dent Manu Man­noor, under­grad­u­ate Jef­fer­son Clay­ton, and asso­ciate research scholar Amartya Sen­gupta at Prince­ton. Co-authors included Hu Tao, David Kaplan and Fiorenzo Omenetto of Tufts Uni­ver­sity and Rajesh Naik of the Air Force Research Laboratory.

Sup­port for the research was pro­vided by the Amer­i­can Asthma Foun­da­tion and the Air Force Office of Sci­en­tific Research. A full account of the research can be found here.

Tagged with:
 

Princeton’s already enor­mously pop­u­lar intro­duc­tory com­puter sci­ence classes soon will be avail­able on the new online learn­ing plat­form Cours­era. The first, on algo­rithms, cre­ated by Robert Sedgewick and jointly devel­oped over the past decade by Sedgewick and his col­league Kevin Wayne, will be online late in the summer.

Sedgewick tells EQN that while it will be fab­u­lous to have videos of his lec­tures online as part of Cours­era, the courses already have a huge reach thanks to inno­v­a­tive course-related web­sites that Wayne and he have been devel­op­ing for years.

More than half of all Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity under­grad­u­ates, regard­less of major, take one of Sedgewick and Wayne’s com­puter sci­ence courses. More­over their Prince­ton course web­sites already have a global reach: in 2011, they had 1.5 mil­lion unique vis­i­tors from across the world.

The algo­rithms course is based on a series of books by Sedgewick that have been best­sellers for decades (the most recent edi­tion coau­thored with Kevin Wayne). A sec­ond  Sedgewick course, “Ana­lytic Com­bi­na­torics,” based on the sem­i­nal text­book on the sub­ject writ­ten by Philippe Fla­jo­let and Sedgewick, will be offered in Spring 2013.

Sedgewick’s Algo­rithms text­books have had wide influ­ence on the teach­ing of com­puter sci­ence since the first edi­tion was pub­lished in 1983. They are char­ac­ter­ized by ele­gant imple­men­ta­tions in real pro­gram­ming lan­guages and demon­strate at the same time a wide range of real-world appli­ca­tions in graph­ics, ani­ma­tion and dif­fer­ent sci­en­tific disciplines.

While non-Princeton stu­dents will ben­e­fit from free online access to these world-class com­puter sci­ence courses, Prince­ton stu­dents also will profit from the Cours­era rela­tion­ship, Sedgewick says.

This will lead to more and bet­ter web con­tent, improv­ing what Prince­ton stu­dents already use,” he said. “It will pro­vide exten­sive and pow­er­ful tools for their pre­cep­tors, who will then have more time for per­sonal inter­ac­tion with students.”

This fall Cours­era also will be fea­tur­ing a course on com­puter archi­tec­ture by elec­tri­cal engi­neer­ing assis­tant pro­fes­sor David Went­zlaff.

Take note: the Prince­ton Lap­top Orches­tra, a k a PLOrk,  is per­form­ing at Richard­son Audi­to­rium this Saturday.

How exactly does one go about mak­ing an orches­tra out of lap­tops? “That’s a ques­tion we try to answer with every piece of ours,” Rebecca Fiebrink, the cur­rent co-director of PLOrk and an assis­tant pro­fes­sor of com­puter sci­ence, tells the Daily Prince­ton­ian.

It might be anal­o­gous to a con­ven­tional instru­ment in that every time the stu­dent makes a phys­i­cal ges­ture a sound is trig­gered, and the way that per­son makes the ges­ture changes the nature of the sound, such as key strokes and mouse clicks, and for a lot of pieces we use the motion sen­sor that’s built into the laptop.”

Get your tick­ets (only ten bucks!) here and read the full Prince piece here.

Photo by Lorene Lavora.